1.7 Examples of -cosmoi
We briefly tour a few examples of -cosmoi. The following theorem should be quite difficult to formalize:
Proposition
1.7.1
the -cosmos of quasi-categories
The full subcategory of quasi-categories defines an -cosmos in which the isofibrations, equivalences, and trivial fibrations coincide with the classes already bearing these names.
Proof
▶
The proof requires myriad combinatorial results about the class of isofibrations between quasi-categories. See
[
RV22
,
§
D
]
.
Two further examples fit into a common paradigm: both arise as full subcategories of the -cosmos of quasi-categories and inherit their -cosmos structures from this inclusion (see Lemma
[
RV22
,
6.1.4
]
), but it is also instructive, and ultimately takes less work, to describe the resulting -cosmos structures directly.
Definition
1.7.2
isofibrations of categories
An isofibration between categories is a functor satisfying the displayed right lifting property for the inclusion of both endpoints of the free-living isomorphism:
As the inclusion the domain of the free-living isomorphism is a retract of the inclusion of the codomain, and vice versa, lifting against either endpoints implies lifting against both endpoints.
Proposition
1.7.3
the -cosmos of categories
The category of 1-categories defines an -cosmos whose isofibrations are the isofibrations. The equivalences are the equivalences of categories and the trivial fibrations are surjective equivalences: equivalences of categories that are also surjective on objects.
Proof
▶
It is well-known that the 2-category of categories is complete (and in fact also cocomplete) as a -enriched category (see
[
Kel89
]
). The categorically enriched category of categories becomes a quasi-categorically enriched category by applying the nerve functor to the hom-categories (see §1.6). Since the nerve functor is a right adjoint, it follows formally that these 2-categorical limits become simplicially enriched limits. In particular, as proscribed in Proposition 1.6.9, the cotensor of a category by a simplicial set is defined to be the functor category . This completes the verification of axiom i.
Since the class of isofibrations is characterized by a right lifting property, the isofibrations are closed under all of the limit constructions of 1.5.1ii except for the last two. For these, the Leibniz closure subsumes the closure under exponentiation.
To verify that isofibrations of categories are stable under forming Leibniz cotensors with monomorphisms of simplicial sets , we must solve the lifting problem below-left
which transposes to the lifting problem above-right, which we can solve by hand. Here the map defines a natural isomorphism between and a second functor. Our task is to lift this to a natural isomorphism from to another functor that extends the natural isomorphism along . Note this functor need not be an inclusion, but it is injective on objects, which is enough.
We define the components of by cases. If an object is equal to for some define ; otherwise, use the fact that is an isofibration to define to be any lift of the isomorphism to an isomorphism in with domain . The data of the map also entails the specification of the functor that is the codomain of the natural isomorphism . On objects, this functor is given by . On morphisms, this functor defined in the unique way that makes into a natural transformation:
This completes the proof that defines an -cosmos. Since the nerve of a functor category, such as , is isomorphic to the exponential between their nerves, the equivalences of categories coincide with the equivalences of Definition 1.3.15. It follows that the equivalences in the -cosmos of categories coincide with equivalences of categories, and since the surjective equivalences are the intersection of the equivalences and the isofibrations, this completes the proof.
Similarly:
Proposition
1.7.4
the -cosmos of Kan complexes
The category of Kan complexes defines an -cosmos whose isofibrations are the Kan fibrations: maps that lift against all horn inclusions for and .
One of the key advantages of the -cosmological approach to abstract category theory is that there are a myriad varieties of “fibered” -cosmoi that can be built from a given -cosmos, which means that any theorem proven in this axiomatic framework specializes and generalizes to those contexts. The most basic of these derived -cosmoi is the -cosmos of isofibrations over a fixed base, which we introduce now.
Proposition
1.7.5
sliced -cosmoi
For any -cosmos and any -category there is an -cosmos of isofibrations over whose
objects are isofibrations with codomain
functor spaces, say from to , are defined by pullback
and abbreviated to when the specified isofibrations are clear from context
isofibrations are commutative triangles of isofibrations over
terminal object is and products are defined by the pullback along the diagonal
pullbacks and limits of towers of isofibrations are created by the forgetful functor
simplicial cotensor of with is constructed by the pullback
and in which a map over
is an equivalence in the -cosmos if and only if is an equivalence in .
Proof
▶
The functor spaces are quasi-categories since axiom 1.5.1ii asserts that for any isofibration in the map is an isofibration of quasi-categories. Other parts of this axiom imply that each of the limit constructions — such as the products and cotensors constructed in iv and vi — define isofibrations over . The closure properties of the isofibrations in follow from the corresponding ones in . The most complicated of these is the Leibniz cotensor stability of the isofibrations in , which follows from the corresponding property in , since for a monomorphism of simplicial sets and an isofibration over as in iii above, the map is constructed by pulling back along .
The fact that the above constructions define simplicially enriched limits in a simplicially enriched slice category are standard from enriched category theory. It remains only to verify that the equivalences in the -cosmos of isofibrations are created by the forgetful functor . Suppose first that the map displayed in vii defines an equivalence in . Then for any isofibration the induced map on functor spaces in is defined by the pullback:
Since is an equivalence in , the map is an equivalence, and so it follows that the induced map on fibers over is an equivalence as well.
For the converse implication, we appeal to Lemma 1.5.9. If is an equivalence in then it admits a homotopy inverse in . The inverse equivalence also defines an inverse equivalence in and the required simplicial homotopies in
are defined by composing with the top horizontal leg of the pullback defining the cotensor in . □
Many, though not all, of the -cosmoi we encounter “in the wild” satisfy an additional axiom:
Definition
1.7.6
cartesian closed -cosmoi
An -cosmos is cartesian closed if the product bifunctor extends to a simplicially enriched two-variable adjunction
in which the right adjoints preserve isofibrations for all .
For instance, the -cosmos of quasi-categories is cartesian closed, with the exponentials defined as (special cases of) simplicial cotensors. This is one of the reasons that we use the same notation for cotensor and for exponential. Note in this case the functor spaces and the exponentials coincide. The same is true for the cartesian closed -cosmoi of categories and of Kan complexes. In general, the functor space from to is the “underlying quasi-category” of the exponential whenever it exists.